P. v. Velto
Filed 3/24/06 P. v. Velto CA5
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 977(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 977(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 977.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
| THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. CYNTHIA VELTO, Defendant and Appellant. |
F047323
(Super. Ct. No. CR13666)
O P I N I O N |
THE COURT*
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Madera County. Jennifer R.S. Detjen, Judge.
Linda J. Zachritz, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant.
Bill Lockyer, Attorney General, Robert R. Anderson, Chief Assistant Attorney General, Mary Jo Graves, Assistant Attorney General, and Charles A. French, Deputy Attorney General, for Plaintiff and Respondent.
-ooOoo-
Appellant, Cynthia Velto, pled guilty to conspiracy to bring controlled substances into prison (Pen. Code , §§ 182, 4573) and admitted allegations that she had a prior conviction within the meaning of the three strikes law (Pen. Code, § 667, subds.(b)-(i))). On January 14, 2005, the court sentenced Velto to a four-year term, the mitigated term of two years double to four years because of Velto's strike conviction.
Velto's appellate counsel has filed a brief which summarizes the facts, with citations to the record, raises no issues, and asks this court to independently review the record. (People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436.) Velto has not responded to this court's invitation to submit additional briefing.
Following independent review of the record we find that no reasonably arguable factual or legal issues exist.
The judgment is affirmed.
Publication courtesy of California pro bono legal advice.
Analysis and review provided by La Mesa Apartment Manager Attorneys.
* Before Vartabedian, Acting P.J., Harris, J., and Wiseman, J.
