legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Vaughn

P. v. Vaughn
02:04:2008



P. v. Vaughn



Filed 1/29/08 P. v. Vaughn CA2/6



NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS













California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.



IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA



SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT



DIVISION SIX



THE PEOPLE,



Plaintiff and Respondent,



v.



SALLY ANN VAUGHN,



Defendant and Appellant.



2d Crim. No. B200092



(Super. Ct. No. 1145658)



(Santa Barbara County)



Sally Ann Vaughn appeals her conviction, by plea of no contest, of one count of assault with a deadly weapon (Pen. Code, 245, subd. (a)(1)) and one felony count of hit and run. (Veh. Code, 20001, subd. (a).) The charges arise from an incident in which appellant intentionally hit a bicyclist with her automobile. While the criminal charges were pending, appellant was twice declared incompetent and transferred to Patton State Hospital for mental health treatment. After her competency was restored the second time, the trial court dismissed the hit and run count on respondent's motion, suspended imposition of sentence, placed appellant on probation and released her from custody subject to various conditions including revocation of her driving privilege.



We appointed counsel to represent appellant in this appeal. After counsel's examination of the record, counsel filed an opening brief raising no issues.



On November 7, 2007, we advised appellant that she had 30 days within which to personally submit any contentions or issues that she wished to raise on appeal. We have not received a response.



We have reviewed the entire record and are satisfied that appellant's attorney has fully complied with his responsibilities and that no arguable issue exists. (People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436, 441.)



The judgment is affirmed.



NOT TO BE PUBLISHED.



YEGAN, J.



We concur:



GILBERT, P.J.



PERREN, J.




James F. Rigall, Judge



Superior Court County of Santa Barbara



______________________________



California Appellate Project, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, Jonathan B. Steiner, Executive Director and Richard B. Lennon, Staff Attorney, for Appellant.



No appearance for Respondent.



Publication Courtesy of California attorney directory.



Analysis and review provided by Oceanside Property line attorney.





Description Sally Ann Vaughn appeals her conviction, by plea of no contest, of one count of assault with a deadly weapon (Pen. Code, 245, subd. (a)(1)) and one felony count of hit and run. (Veh. Code, 20001, subd. (a).) The charges arise from an incident in which appellant intentionally hit a bicyclist with her automobile. While the criminal charges were pending, appellant was twice declared incompetent and transferred to Patton State Hospital for mental health treatment. After her competency was restored the second time, the trial court dismissed the hit and run count on respondent's motion, suspended imposition of sentence, placed appellant on probation and released her from custody subject to various conditions including revocation of her driving privilege. Court have reviewed the entire record and are satisfied that appellant's attorney has fully complied with his responsibilities and that no arguable issue exists. (People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436, 441.) The judgment is affirmed.


Rating
0/5 based on 0 votes.

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale