P. v. Tsou
Filed 8/10/06 P. v. Tsou CA2/2
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 977(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 977(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 977.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION TWO
| THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. ARTHUR TSOU, Defendant and Appellant. | B185738 (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. GA059233) |
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County.
Lisa B. Lench, Judge. Affirmed.
Leonard J. Klaif, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant.
Bill Lockyer, Attorney General, Robert R. Anderson, Chief Assistant Attorney General, Pamela C. Hamanaka, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Kyle Brodie and Paul M. Roadarmel, Jr., Deputy Attorneys General, for Plaintiff and Respondent.
___________________________________________________
A jury convicted appellant of sexual battery (Pen. Code, § 243.4, subd. (a)),[1] felony unlawful imprisonment (§ 236), and misdemeanor interference with a wireless communications device (§ 591.5). The trial court ordered a 90-day diagnostic examination pursuant to section 1203.03. Upon receipt of the diagnostic report, the trial court denied probation and, as to count 1, ordered appellant to serve three years in state prison. As to count 2, the court ordered appellant to serve two years in state prison concurrent to count 1. As to count 3, the appellant was ordered to serve six months in state prison concurrent to count 1. Appellant received credit for 213 days in custody.
On appeal, appellant contends that the â€
