Fear Not Law Articles: P. v. Trujillo

P. v. Trujillo

Filed 3/11/08 P. v. Trujillo CA5

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

THE PEOPLE,

Plaintiff and Respondent,

MONIQUE LETICIA TRUJILLO,

Defendant and Appellant.

F053083

(Super. Ct. No. F06909416)

O P I N I O N

THE COURT^*

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Fresno County. David Gottlieb, Judge.

Deborah Prucha, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant.

No appearance for Plaintiff and Respondent.

-ooOoo-

Pursuant to a plea agreement covering the instant case and Fresno County Superior Court case No. F06903109-7 (case No. 109-7), appellant Monique Trujillo pled guilty to a single count of fraudulently issuing checks without sufficient funds (Pen. Code, 476a, subd. (a)). At a sentencing hearing covering both cases, in the instant case the court suspended imposition of sentence and placed appellant on three years probation, one of the terms of which was that she serve 240 days in county jail. The court ordered that the county jail term be served concurrently with a term of the same length imposed as a condition of probation in case No. 109-7.

Appellants appointed appellate counsel has filed an opening brief which summarizes the pertinent facts, with citations to the record, raises no issues, and asks that this court independently review the record. (Peoplev.Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436.) Appellant has not responded to this courts invitation to submit additional briefing.

FACTS

Between May 23, 2006, and June 6, 2006, appellant wrote seven checks without sufficient funds to cover them. The checks, written to four different businesses, totaled $747.18.

DISCUSSION

Following independent review of the record, we have concluded that no reasonably arguable legal or factual issues exist.

DISPOSITION

The judgment is affirmed.

Publication Courtesy of California free legal resources.

Analysis and review provided by Spring Valley Property line attorney.

^*Before Wiseman, Acting P.J., Gomes, J., and Kane, J.

Description	Pursuant to a plea agreement covering the instant case and Fresno County Superior Court case No. F06903109-7 (case No. 109-7), appellant Monique Trujillo pled guilty to a single count of fraudulently issuing checks without sufficient funds (Pen. Code, 476a, subd. (a)). At a sentencing hearing covering both cases, in the instant case the court suspended imposition of sentence and placed appellant on three years probation, one of the terms of which was that she serve 240 days in county jail. The court ordered that the county jail term be served concurrently with a term of the same length imposed as a condition of probation in case No. 109-7. Appellants appointed appellate counsel has filed an opening brief which summarizes the pertinent facts, with citations to the record, raises no issues, and asks that this court independently review the record. (Peoplev.Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436.) Appellant has not responded to this courts invitation to submit additional briefing. The judgment is affirmed.
Rating	0/5 1 2 3 4 5 0/5 based on 0 votes.