P. v. Skinner
Filed 3/11/08 P. v. Skinner CA4/1
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.
COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION ONE
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. CHRISTOPHER M. SKINNER, Defendant and Appellant. | D051607 (Super. Ct. No. SCE268897) |
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Diego County, Herbert J. Exarhos, Judge. Affirmed.
Christopher M. Skinner entered a negotiated guilty plea to receiving a stolen motor vehicle (Pen. Code, 496d) and admitted he had served three prior prison terms within the meaning of Penal Code section 667.5, subdivision (b). The plea agreement called for a five-year stipulated prison term. Skinner was sentenced in accordance with the plea agreement as follows: the middle terms of two years plus one additional year for each prior prison term.
On February 1, 2007, Skinner possessed a stolen motor vehicle.
Appointed appellate counsel has filed a brief setting forth the evidence in the superior court. Counsel presents no argument for reversal, but asks that this court review the record for error as mandated by People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436. Pursuant to Anders v. California (1967) 386 U.S. 738, counsel refers to as a possible, but not arguable, issue: whether Skinner was properly advised of his constitutional rights and voluntarily waived them when he pleaded guilty.
We granted Skinner permission to file a brief on his own behalf. He has not responded.
A review of the record pursuant to People v. Wende, supra, 25 Cal.3d 436 and Anders v. California, supra, 386 U.S. 738, including the possible issue referred to by appellate counsel, has disclosed no reasonably arguable appellate issue. Competent counsel has represented Skinner on this appeal.
DISPOSITION
The judgment is affirmed.
HALLER, J.
WE CONCUR:
HUFFMAN, Acting P. J.
AARON, J.
Publication courtesy of California pro bono lawyer directory.
Analysis and review provided by Chula Vista Property line Lawyers.
