P. v. Scott

Filed 9/29/06 P. v. Scott CA5

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 977(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 977(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 977.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

THE PEOPLE,

Plaintiff and Respondent,

KEVIN BAIN SCOTT,

Defendant and Appellant.

F050039

(Super. Ct. No. F05907894)

O P I N I O N

THE COURT^*

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Fresno County. David Gottlieb, Judge.

William Davies, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant.

Bill Lockyer, Attorney General, Robert R. Anderson, Chief Assistant Attorney General, Mary Jo Graves, Assistant Attorney General, and Charles A. French, Deputy Attorney General, for Plaintiff and Respondent.

-ooOoo-

On November 30, 2005, appellant, Kevin Bain Scott, pled no contest to stalking in violation of a court order (Pen. Code § 646.9, subd. (b)). On January 18, 2006, the court suspended imposition of sentence and placed appellant on probation for three years on condition that he serve 300 days of local custody. On January 25, 2006, the court suspended the balance of Scott’s local custody time on condition that he complete the Decision Home Program.Scott’s appellate counsel has filed a brief which summarizes the facts, with citations to the record, raises no issues, and asks this court to independently review the record. (People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436.) Scott has not responded to this court’s invitation to submit additional briefing.

Following independent review of the record we find that no reasonably arguable factual or legal issues exist.

The judgment is affirmed.

Publication courtesy of San Diego pro bono legal advice.

Analysis and review provided by Poway Property line attorney.

^* Before Harris, Acting P.J., Cornell, J., and Dawson, J.

Description	Appellant pled no contest to stalking in violation of a court order. Appellant was placed on probation for three years on condition that he serve 300 days of local custody. Court later suspended the balance of defendant's local custody time on condition that he complete the Decision Home Program. Defendant asks the court to independently review the record. Defendant was notified of his right to submit an additional argument. No argument was submitted. Judgment Affirmed.
Rating	0/5 1 2 3 4 5 0/5 based on 0 votes.