Fear Not Law Articles: P. v. Sanchez

P. v. Sanchez

Filed 2/11/08 P. v. Sanchez CA2/2

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION TWO

THE PEOPLE,

Plaintiff and Respondent,

JESUS CHUY SANCHEZ,

Defendant and Appellant.

B199063

(Los Angeles County

Super. Ct. No. VA097075)

THE COURT:^*

Jesus Chuy Sanchez (appellant), appeals from the judgment entered following a wjury trial that resulted in his conviction of second degree robbery in violation of Penal Code section 211.^{^[1]} The trial court found true the allegation that appellant had suffered a prior conviction within the meaning of sections 1170.12, subdivisions (a) through (d), and 667, subdivisions (b) through (i). On September 12, 2006, appellant hit Bruce Tesillo on the back of his head as he was napping in a park. Appellant threatened Tesillo, reached into Tesillos pockets, and demanded his cellphone. Tesillo refused to hand the cellphone over. Appellant grabbed Tesillos sunglasses and ran.

Appellant was sentenced to the low term of two years, which was doubled as a second strike. The trial court imposed an additional five years for the prior conviction and added one year for being in violation of probation for a total of 10 years in state prison.

We appointed counsel to represent him on this appeal.

After examination of the record, counsel filed a Statement by Counsel on Appeal Pursuant to People v. Wendein which no issues were raised.

On October 22, 2007, we advised appellant that he had 30 days within which to personally submit any contentions or issues which he wished us to consider. No response has been received to date.

We have examined the entire record and are satisfied that appellants attorney has fully complied with her responsibilities and that no arguable issues exist. (People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436, 441.)

The judgment is affirmed.

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS.

Publication courtesy of San Diego pro bono legal advice.

Analysis and review provided by Poway Property line attorney.

^* BOREN, P. J., DOI TODD, J., CHAVEZ, J.

^{^[1]} All subsequent code section references are to the Penal Code.

Description	Jesus Chuy Sanchez (appellant), appeals from the judgment entered following a wjury trial that resulted in his conviction of second degree robbery in violation of Penal Code section 211.[1] The trial court found true the allegation that appellant had suffered a prior conviction within the meaning of sections 1170.12, subdivisions (a) through (d), and 667, subdivisions (b) through (i). On September 12, 2006, appellant hit Bruce Tesillo on the back of his head as he was napping in a park. Appellant threatened Tesillo, reached into Tesillos pockets, and demanded his cellphone. Tesillo refused to hand the cellphone over. Appellant grabbed Tesillos sunglasses and ran. Appellant was sentenced to the low term of two years, which was doubled as a second strike. The trial court imposed an additional five years for the prior conviction and added one year for being in violation of probation for a total of 10 years in state prison. Court appointed counsel to represent him on this appeal. The judgment is affirmed.
Rating	0/5 1 2 3 4 5 0/5 based on 0 votes.