P. v. Ortega
Filed 2/7/08 P. v. Ortega CA3
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED
California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT
(Yolo)
----
THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. FERNANDO MARTINEZ ORTEGA, Defendant and Appellant. | C056455 (Super. Ct. No. CRF064499) |
On August 7, 2006, police officers responded to a report of a theft in progress at a residence in West Sacramento. They stopped defendant, who matched the description of the suspect. He was carrying a duffel bag containing items stolen from the West Sacramento residence.
Defendant entered a negotiated plea of no contest to receiving stolen property (Pen. Code, 496, subd. (a)) and was sentenced to a stipulated lower term of 16 months in state prison and ordered to pay various fines and fees.
Defendant appeals. He did not obtain a certificate of probable cause.
We appointed counsel to represent him on appeal. Counsel filed an opening brief that sets forth the facts of the case and requests this court to review the record and determine whether there are any arguable issues on appeal. (People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436.) Defendant was advised by counsel of the right to file a supplemental brief within 30 days of the date of filing of the opening brief. More than 30 days elapsed, and we received no communication from defendant.
Having undertaken an examination of the entire record, we find no arguable error that would result in a disposition more favorable to defendant.
The judgment is affirmed.
SCOTLAND, P.J.
We concur:
BLEASE , J.
HULL, J.
Publication courtesy of California free legal advice.
Analysis and review provided by Carlsbad Property line attorney.
