P. v. Namchek
Filed 6/20/13 P. v. Namchek CA2/6
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS
California
Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or
relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except
as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This
opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for
purposes of rule 8.1115.
IN THE COURT OF
APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
SECOND APPELLATE
DISTRICT
DIVISION SIX
THE PEOPLE,
Plaintiff and
Respondent,
v.
SANDRA ANN NAMCHEK,
Defendant and
Appellant.
2d Crim. No.
B245546
(Super. Ct. No.
2011032981)
(Ventura
County)
Sandra Ann Namchek
appeals the judgment entered after she pled guilty to
Saf. Code, § 11377, subd. (a)). The
trial court placed her on drug treatment probation pursuant to Penal Code
section 1210.1. Appellant was also found
in violation of her probation in another case, and probation was revoked and
reinstated.
Because appellant pled
guilty prior to trial, the relevant facts are derived from the
was found in appellant's pocket during a probation search. Officers also found a glass smoking pipe in a
trash can in appellant's motel room.
We appointed
appeal. After counsel's examination of
the record, she filed an opening brief in which no issues were raised.
On March 27, 2013, we advised appellant that she had
30 days within which to personally submit any
consider. No response has been received.
We have reviewed the
entire record and are satisfied that appellant's attorney has fully complied
with her responsibilities and that no arguable
issues exist. (People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436, 443; People v. Kelly (2006) 40 Cal.4th 106, 125–126.)
The judgment is
affirmed.
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED.
PERREN,
J.
We concur:
GILBERT, P. J.
YEGAN, J.
>
Kevin J. McGee, Judge
Superior
Court County
of Ventura
______________________________
California Appellate
Project, Jonathan B. Steiner, Suzan E. Hier, under appointment by the Court of
Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant.
No appearance for
Plaintiff and Respondent.
appellant filed a request for a certificate of probable cause alleging (1) she
is innocent of the charge to which she pled guilty; (2) she was arrested and
charged in violation of her civil and constitutional rights; (3) she has
submitted "claims of liability" to several agencies that have never
been addressed; and (4) she was "tricked" into pleading guilty and
wished to withdraw her plea, file a motion to suppress, and have a jury trial. Although the court granted a certificate of
probable cause, none of appellant's allegations are factually or legally
supported by the record.
