P. v. Moore

Filed 2/9/06 P. v. Moore CA6

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 977(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 977(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 977

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

THE PEOPLE,

Plaintiff and Respondent, H029011

(Santa Clara County

v. Super. Ct. No. CC442414)

RICHARD JOE MOORE,

Defendant and Appellant.

_________________________________/

Richard Moore appeals after pleading nolo contendere to one count of second degree robbery (Pen. Code, §§ 211-212.5, subd. (c)) and admitting that he used a handgun in the commission of the robbery (Pen. Code, § 12022, subd. (a)(1)). Appellant was sentenced to state prison for a total of three years. We appointed counsel to represent appellant. Counsel has filed an opening brief which states the case and the facts, but raises no specific issues. We have notified appellant of his right to submit written argument. Appellant has not submitted written argument.

Pursuant to People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436, we have reviewed the entire record and have concluded that there is no arguable issue on appeal.

The judgment is affirmed.

______________________________

ELIA, J.

WE CONCUR:

_______________________________________

PREMO, Acting P. J.

_______________________________________

BAMATTRE-MANOUKIAN, J.

Publication courtesy of Del Mar Minimum Wage Lawyer ( www.mcmillanlaw.us ) and Del Mar Lawyers Directory ( www.fearnotlaw.com )