legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. May

P. v. May
07:18:2006

P. v. May





Filed 7/17/06 P. v. May CA2/6







NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS






California Rules of Court, rule 977(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 977(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 977.





IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA



SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT



DIVISION SIX










THE PEOPLE,


Plaintiff and Respondent,


v.


WILLIAM EDWARD PRESTON MAY,


Defendant and Appellant.



2d Crim. No. B189702


(Super. Ct. No. F376156)


(San Luis Obispo County)




William Edward Preston May appeals from the judgment (order of commitment) entered following a court trial in which he was determined to be a mentally disordered offender. (MDO; Pen. Code, § 2962 et seq.) He was committed to the California Department of Mental Health for treatment as a condition of his parole. (Pen. Code, § 2966, subd. (c).)


We appointed counsel to represent appellant in this appeal. After examination of the record, counsel filed an opening brief in which no issues were raised.


On May 31, 2006, we advised appellant that he had 30 days within which to personally submit any contentions or issues which he wished us to consider. On July 6, 2006, we received a supplemental brief from appellant arguing, among other things, that his severe mental disorder is in remission.


We have examined the entire record and are satisfied that appellant's attorney has fully complied with his responsibilities and that no arguable issues exist. (People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436, 441.)


The judgment (order of commitment) is affirmed.


NOT TO BE PUBLISHED.


YEGAN, J.


We concur:


GILBERT, P.J.


COFFEE, J.


Christopher G. Money, Judge



Superior Court County of San Luis Obispo



______________________________




Rudy Kraft, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant.


No appearance for Respondent.


Publication Courtesy of California free legal resources.


Analysis and review provided by Spring Valley Real Estate Attorney.





Description A decision as to an order of commitment to the California Department of Mental Health for treatment of a mentally disordered offender.
Rating
0/5 based on 0 votes.

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale