P. v. Madrigal
Filed 4/17/06 P. v. Madrigal CA2/6
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 977(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 977(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 977.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION SIX
| THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. JOSE ERNEST MADRIGAL, Defendant and Appellant. | 2d Crim. No. B185465 (Super. Ct. No. 1082125) (Santa Barbara County)
|
Appellant Jose Ernest Madrigal pled no contest to recklessly evading a peace officer. (Veh. Code, § 2800.2.) He appeals from an order revoking probation after a hearing and sentencing him to prison for the two-year middle term. We appointed counsel to represent Madrigal in this appeal.
After reviewing the record, counsel filed an opening brief raising no issues and requesting this court to independently examine the record pursuant to People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436. We advised Madrigal that he had 30 days in which to submit a written brief or letter stating any contentions or arguments he wished us to consider, but have received no response.
We have examined the entire record and are satisfied that appellate counsel has fully complied with his responsibilities and that no arguable issues exist. (People v. Wende, supra, 25 Cal.3d at p. 441.)
The judgment is affirmed.
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED.
COFFEE, J.
We concur:
GILBERT, P.J.
YEGAN, J.
Barry Hammer, Judge
Superior Court County of Santa Barbara
______________________________
Richard B. Lennon, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant.
No appearance for Plaintiff and Respondent.
Publication Courtesy of San Diego County Legal Resource Directory.
Analysis and review provided by San Diego County Apartment Manager Lawyers.
