legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Lazenby

P. v. Lazenby
09:10:2008



P. v. Lazenby



Filed 9/8/08 P. v. Lazenby CA2/5



NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS













California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.



IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA



SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT



DIVISION FIVE



THE PEOPLE,



Plaintiff and Respondent,



v.



ANYLA RENE LAZENBY,



Defendant and Appellant.



B206364



(Los Angeles County



Super. Ct. No. SA065588)



APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Keith L. Schwartz, Judge. Dismissed.



Patrick J. Hennessey, Jr., under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant.



No appearance on behalf of Plaintiff and Respondent.



On November 30, 2007, defendant, Anyla Rene Lazenby, pled nolo contendere to a drug charge. Her plea withdrawal motion was denied. Defendant has made no effort to secure a probable cause certificate. We have a duty to raise issues concerning our jurisdiction on our own motion. (Jennings v. Marralle (1994) 8 Cal.4th 121, 126; Olson v. Cory (1983) 35 Cal.3d 390, 398.) As a result, we issued an order to show cause concerning possible dismissal of the appeal and permitted the parties to orally argue the dismissal issue.



Defendant has failed to fully and timely comply with both Penal Code section 1237.5 and California Rules of Court, rule 8.304(b). (In re Chavez (2003) 30 Cal.4th 643, 651; People v. Mendez (1999) 19 Cal.4th 1084, 1099; People v. Way (2003) 113 Cal.App.4th 733, 736.) Without a probable cause certificate, defendant cannot appeal. (People v. Kaanehe (1977) 19 Cal.3d 1, 8; People v. Ribero (1971) 4 Cal.3d 55, 61; People v. West (1970) 3 Cal.3d 595, 600-601; People v. Ward (1967) 66 Cal.2d 571, 574-576.) If defendant believes a jurisdictional error has occurred in connection with the fines, she may raise the issue before the trial court or in a habeas corpus petition.



The appeal is dismissed.



NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS



TURNER, P. J.



We concur:



ARMSTRONG, J. KRIEGLER, J.



Publication courtesy of San Diego pro bono legal advice.



Analysis and review provided by Poway Property line Lawyers.



San Diego Case Information provided by www.fearnotlaw.com





Description On November 30, 2007, defendant, Anyla Rene Lazenby, pled nolo contendere to a drug charge. Her plea withdrawal motion was denied. Defendant has made no effort to secure a probable cause certificate. We have a duty to raise issues concerning our jurisdiction on our own motion. (Jennings v. Marralle (1994) 8 Cal.4th 121, 126; Olson v. Cory (1983) 35 Cal.3d 390, 398.) As a result, we issued an order to show cause concerning possible dismissal of the appeal and permitted the parties to orally argue the dismissal issue. The appeal is dismissed.


Rating
0/5 based on 0 votes.

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2026 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2026 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale