P. v. Lariz



Filed 3/9/11 P. v. Lariz CA4/3






NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS


California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.



IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION THREE

THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. ALFREDO RUVALCABA LARIZ, Defendant and Appellant.

G043504 (Super. Ct. No. 09CF1262) O P I N I O N

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Orange County, James P. Marion, Judge. Affirmed.
Guillermo Cabrera, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant.
Edmund G. Brown, Jr., Attorney General, Dane R. Gillette, Chief Assistant Attorney General, and Gary W. Schons, Assistant Attorney General, for Plaintiff and Respondent.
THE COURT:*
Appellant, Alfredo Ruvalcaba Lariz, seeks appellate review of the sealed portion of the search warrant affidavit and the transcript of the in camera hearing conducted as a result of filing motions to reveal the identity of a confidential informant, motion to suppress evidence obtained as a result of the warrant, and motions to traverse and quash the search warrant.
FACTS
Two days after a magistrate signed a search warrant authorizing a search of the business â€