P. v. Judge
Filed 4/1/10 P. v. Judge CA4/1
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.
COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION ONE
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. ANTHONY JUDGE, Defendant and Appellant. | D054342 (Super. Ct. No. MH102101) |
THE COURT:
It is ordered that the opinion filed herein on March 24, 2010, be modified as follows:
1. In the Disposion, on page 21, the words "the Attorney General" are changed to "the People" so the Disposition reads:
The case is remanded to the trial court to determine whether the People can demonstrate the constitutional justification for imposing on SVP's a greater burden than is imposed on MDO's and NGI's in order to obtain release from commitment. In all other respects, the judgment is affirmed.
There is no change in the judgment.
NARES, Acting P. J.
Copies to: All parties
Publication Courtesy of San Diego County Legal Resource Directory.
Analysis and review provided by San Diego County Property line attorney.
