P. v. Jenkins
Filed 6/10/08 P. v. Jenkins CA4/1
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.
COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION ONE
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. BRANDON JAMES JENKINS, Defendant and Appellant. | D051753 (Super. Ct. No. SCD203617) |
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Diego County, Timothy R. Walsh, Judge. Affirmed.
Brandon James Jenkins entered a negotiated guilty plea to burglary (Pen. Code, 459) and admitted he had a prior serious/violent felony or strike conviction (Pen. Code, 667, subds. (b)-(i)). The plea bargain called for a stipulated sentence of four years and the dismissal of four other felony counts, two misdemeanor counts and an allegation that Jenkins had served a prior prison term. Jenkins was sentenced in accordance with the plea bargain. Jenkins did not obtain a certificate of probable cause.
FACTS
In June 2006 Jenkins burglarized a storage unit leased by another individual.
DISCUSSION
Appointed appellate counsel has filed a brief setting forth evidence in the superior court. Counsel presents no argument for reversal, but asks that this court review the record for error as mandated by People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436. Pursuant to Anders v. California (1967) 386 U.S. 738, counsel refers to as possible, but not arguable, issues: (1) whether Barker can raise an ineffective assistance of counsel argument; and (2) whether Barker was awarded the correct number of prejudgment custody credits.
We granted Jenkins permission to file a brief on his own behalf. He has not responded.
A review of the record pursuant to People v. Wende, supra, 25 Cal.3d 436 and Anders v. California, supra, 386 U.S. 738, including the possible issues referred to by appellate counsel, has disclosed no reasonably arguable appellate issues. Competent counsel has represented Jenkins on this appeal.
DISPOSITION
The judgment is affirmed.
McINTYRE, J.
WE CONCUR:
McCONNELL, P. J.
BENKE, J.
Publication courtesy of California free legal advice.
Analysis and review provided by Carlsbad Property line attorney.
