P. v. Greer
Filed
1/22/13 P. v. Greer CA2/6
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS
>
California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits
courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for
publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for
publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115>.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION SIX
THE PEOPLE,
Plaintiff and
Respondent,
v.
JOSHUA ADLAI GREER,
Defendant and Appellant.
2d Crim. No. B241232
(Super. Ct. No.
BA388828)
(Los Angeles)
Joshua Adlai Greer
appeals from the judgment entered after a jury convicted him of href="http://www.fearnotlaw.com/">first degree residential burglary. (Pen.
Code, § 459.)href="#_ftn1"
name="_ftnref1" title="">[1] The trial court sentenced
appellant to the upper term of six years state prison and ordered appellant to
pay a $200 restitution fine (§ 1202.4, subd. (b)), a $200 parole
revocation fine (§ 1202.45), victim restitution, (§ 1202.4, subd. (f)), a
$40 court security fee (§ 1465.8), and a $30 criminal conviction
assessment (Gov. Code, § 70373).
We appointed href="http://www.mcmillanlaw.com/">counsel to represent appellant in this
appeal. After examination of the record, counsel filed an
opening brief in which no issues were raised.
On November 30, 2012, we advised appellant that he had 30 days within which to
personally submit any contentions or
issues he wished us to consider.
On January 3, 2013, we
received a letter from appellant stating, among other things, that: he was arrested for assault with a firearm
and erroneously charged with first degree residential burglary with a firearm
enhancement; that he was convicted on inconsistent hearsay evidence; and that
he was denied a fair trial.
The evidence shows that,
on September
12, 2011, appellant confronted Mayra
Amezcua Segura on her front porch, drew
a handgun, and said he was going to kill someone named "Bird." The victim ran inside with her daughter and
called 911. Before the police arrived,
appellant jumped the fence and ran to the rear of the house as Paul Jackson
acted as a look out. Appellant
attempted to open the rear window, tore the window screen while reaching
through the window security bars, and yelled, "Let me in, I'm going to
kill whoever stabbed me in the leg . . . [¶] and whoever lives in th[e]
house."
Appellant and Jackson fled and
were arrested but the handgun was not found.
At the sentencing hearing, the
trial court read and considered a probation report that stated that appellant
was a Gangster Crips gang member, had a history of cocaine and marijuana use,
and had prior convictions for transporting/ selling drugs and receiving stolen
property
We have examined the
entire record and are satisfied that appellant's appointed counsel has fully
complied with her responsibilities and that no arguable
issues exist. (People v. Kelly (2006) 40 Cal.4th
106, 124; People v. Wende
(1979) 25 Cal.3d 436, 441.)
The judgment is
affirmed.
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED.
YEGAN,
J.
We concur:
GILBERT,
P.J.
PERREN,
J.
Ann H. Eggerton, Judge
Superior Court County of Los Angeles
______________________________
Maggie
Shrout, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and
Appellant.
No
appearance for Respondent.
id=ftn1>
href="#_ftnref1"
name="_ftn1" title="">[1] All statutory references are
to the Penal Code, unless otherwise stated.