P. v. Flores
Filed 6/15/06 P. v. Flores CA5
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 977(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 977(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 977.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
| THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. JUAN JACK FLORES, Defendant and Appellant. |
F049336
(Super. Ct. No. DF006615A)
OPINION |
THE COURT*
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Kern County. L. Bryce Chase, Judge.
Deborah Prucha, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant.
Bill Lockyer, Attorney General, Robert R. Anderson, Chief Assistant Attorney General, Mary Jo Graves, Assistant Attorney General, and Charles A. French, Deputy Attorney General, for Plaintiff and Respondent.
-ooOoo-
Appellant, Juan Jack Flores, pled no contest to vehicle theft (Veh. Code, § 10851, subd. (a)) and admitted allegations that he had a prior conviction within the meaning of the three strikes law (Pen. Code, § 667, subds. (b)-(i)). On October 10, 2005, the court sentenced Flores to the mitigated term of 16 months, doubled to 32 months because of Flores's strike conviction.
Flores's appellate counsel has filed a brief which summarizes the facts, with citations to the record, raises no issues, and asks this court to independently review the record. (People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436.) Flores has not responded to this court's invitation to submit additional briefing.
Following independent review of the record we find that no reasonably arguable factual or legal issues exist.
The judgment is affirmed.
Publication courtesy of San Diego free legal advice.
Analysis and review provided by Santee Apartment Manager Attorneys.
* Before Levy, Acting P.J., Cornell, J., and Dawson, J.
