P. v. Estrada
Filed 5/16/06 P. v. Simental CA2/4
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 977(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 977(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 977.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION FOUR
THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. RAY TOMMY SIMENTAL, Defendant and Appellant. | B186556 (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. KA070959) |
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Bruce F. Marrs, Judge. Affirmed in part; Reversed in part, and Modified.
Phillip I. Bronson, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant.
Bill Lockyer, Attorney General, Robert R. Anderson, Chief Assistant Attorney General, Pamela C. Hamanaka, Assistant Attorney General, Lawrence M. Daniels, Steven E. Mercer and Marc A. Kohm, Deputy Attorneys General, for Plaintiff and Respondent.
Defendant Ray Tommy Simental appeals from the judgment of conviction following a jury trial. He was convicted of second degree robbery (count 1; § 211) and grand theft of more than $400 (count 2; § 487, subd. (a)).[1] Defendant admitted that he had previously been convicted of violating section 422, which qualified as both a prior â€
