P. v. Dyson
Filed 7/14/08 P. v. Dyson CA4/1
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.
COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION ONE
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. KEITH DOUGLAS DYSON, Defendant and Appellant. | D051856 (Super. Ct. No. SCD205618) |
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Diego County, Stephanie Sontag, Judge. Affirmed.
Keith Douglas Dyson entered a negotiated guilty plea to burglary (Pen. Code, 459). Under the plea bargain, which called for a two-year stipulated sentence, the prosecution agreed to dismiss a count of petty theft with a prior and two prior prison term allegations. The trial court sentenced Dyson to the middle term of two years in prison for the burglary. Dyson did not obtain a certificate of probable cause.
FACTS
On February 21, 2007, Dyson entered the Ralphs grocery store on Mission Center Road in San Diego. Dyson grabbed a television and ran out of the store. In accepting the plea bargain, Dyson admitted he entered the store with the intent to commit a theft.
DISCUSSION
Appointed appellate counsel has filed a brief setting forth evidence in the superior court. Counsel presents no argument for reversal, but asks that this court review the record for error as mandated by People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436. Pursuant to Anders v. California (1967) 386 U.S. 738, counsel refers to as possible, but not arguable, issues: (1) whether Dyson's negotiated plea was constitutionally valid; and (2) whether there was a sufficient factual basis for the guilty plea.
We granted Dyson permission to file a brief on his own behalf. He has not responded.
A review of the record pursuant to People v. Wende, supra, 25 Cal.3d 436 and Anders v. California, supra, 386 U.S. 738, including the possible issues referred to by appellate counsel, has disclosed no reasonably arguable appellate issues. Competent counsel has represented Dyson on this appeal.
DISPOSITION
The judgment is affirmed.
HUFFMAN, J.
WE CONCUR:
McCONNELL, P. J.
McINTYRE, J.
Publication courtesy of San Diego free legal advice.
Analysis and review provided by Santee Property line attorney.
