P. v. DeHuff
Filed 9/13/12 P. v. DeHuff CA2/5
California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts
and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or
ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for
publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115
IN
THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
SECOND
APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION
FIVE
THE PEOPLE,
Plaintiff and Respondent,
v.
CHRISTOPHER DAVID DEHUFF,
Defendant and Appellant.
B239894
(Los Angeles
County
Super. Ct.
No. PA028453)
APPEAL from an order of the Superior
Court of
County, David B, Gelfound, Judge. Dismissed.
Richard B.
Lennon, under appointment by the Court
of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant.
No
appearance on behalf of Plaintiff and Respondent.
Defendant, Christopher David DeHuff, purports to
appeal from a February 24, 2012 postjudgment order denying
his motion to quash a detainer. Because
the postjudgment order did not appear to be appealable, we issued an order to
show cause re: dismissal. We have a duty to raise issues concerning our
jurisdiction on our own motion. (Jennings
v. Marralle (1994) 8 Cal.4th 121, 126; Olson v. Cory (1983) 35
Cal.3d 390, 398.) We allowed the parties
to brief the issue and permitted the matter to be argued. The postjudgment appeal from the denial of
the motion to quash is not appealable.
(Pen. Code, § 1237, subd. (b); see People
v. Hopkins (2009) 171 Cal.App.4th 305, 308; People v. Gainer (1982) 133 Cal.App.3d 636, 642;
858, 863 disapproved on other grounds in In
re Bakke (1986) 42 Cal.3d 84, 88 641; People
v. Niren (1978) 76 Cal.App.3d 850, 851; 6 Witkin & Epstein, Cal.
Criminal Law (3d ed. 2000) Criminal Appeal, § 59, pp. 304-305.)
The appeal is dismissed.
NOT
TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS
TURNER,
P. J.
We concur:
ARMSTRONG,
J.
KRIEGLER,
J.
