legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Craven

P. v. Craven
01:15:2008



P. v. Craven



Filed 1/10/08 P. v. Craven CA2/1



NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS













California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.



IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA



SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT



DIVISION ONE



THE PEOPLE,



Plaintiff and Respondent,



v.



DONALD CRAVEN,



Defendant and Appellant.



B198530



(Los Angeles County



Super. Ct. No. TA083422)



APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Ellen Carol DeShazer, Judge. Affirmed.



Leonard J. Klaif, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant.



No appearance for Plaintiff and Respondent.



______________________________________




Donald Craven appeals from the judgment entered following revocation of probation entered upon defendants admission of a probation violation. Probation was originally imposed after defendants negotiated plea of no contest to possession of a controlled substance. Defendant was sentenced to two years in state prison. He filed a notice of appeal and we appointed counsel to represent him.



Appointed counsel filed a brief in which no issues were raised. (People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436, 441442.) We then sent letters to defendant and appointed counsel, directing counsel to immediately forward the appellate record to defendant and notifying defendant that within 30 days he could personally submit any contentions or issues that he wished us to consider. More than 30 days have passed and no response has been received.



We have examined the entire record and are satisfied that defendants counsel has fully complied with his responsibilities and that no arguable issues exist. (People v. Kelly (2006) 40 Cal.4th 106, 109110; Peoplev.Wende, supra, 25 Cal.3d at p. 441.)



DISPOSITION



The judgment is affirmed.



NOT TO BE PUBLISHED.



MALLANO, Acting P. J.



We concur:



VOGEL, J.



ROTHSCHILD, J.



Publication courtesy of California free legal advice.



Analysis and review provided by Carlsbad Property line attorney.





Description Donald Craven appeals from the judgment entered following revocation of probation entered upon defendants admission of a probation violation. Probation was originally imposed after defendants negotiated plea of no contest to possession of a controlled substance. Defendant was sentenced to two years in state prison. He filed a notice of appeal and we appointed counsel to represent him.
The judgment is affirmed.


Rating
0/5 based on 0 votes.

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale