legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Cowan CA2/6

scott's Membership Status

Registration Date: Sep 25, 2005
Usergroup: Administrator
Listings Submitted: 0 listings
Total Comments: 0 (0 per day)
Last seen: 21/07/21 - 07:38:53

Biographical Information

Location: San Diego, California
Homepage: http://www.mcmillanlaw.us
Occupation: Lawyer
Birthdate: December 8, 1963 (57 years old)

Contact Information

Submission History

Most recent listings:
P. v. Vincent CA2/7
P. v. Smith CA2/1
Silas v. Arden CA2/1
P. v. Bennett CA2/3
In re Hanna F. CA2/2

Find all listings submitted by scott
P. v. Cowan CA2/6
By
06/07/21

Filed 4/5/21 P. v. Cowan CA2/6

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION SIX

THE PEOPLE,

Plaintiff and Respondent,

v.

RONALD JOHN COWAN,

Defendant and Appellant.

2d Crim. No. B307766

(Super. Ct. No. F493872)

(San Luis Obispo County)

Ronald John Cowan pled no contest to one count of lewd acts with a child under age 14. (Pen. Code, § 288, subd. (a).) The court sentenced him to a total term of eight years and imposed various fines and fees. Cowan appeals his sentence.

We appointed counsel to represent Cowan in this appeal. After examining the record, he filed a brief raising no issues.

On January 26, 2021, we advised Cowan by mail that he had 30 days within which to personally submit any contentions or issues that he wished to raise on appeal. We received no reply.

We have reviewed the entire record and are satisfied that Cowan’s attorney has fully complied with his responsibilities and that no arguable issue exists. (People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436, 441.)

The judgment is affirmed.

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED.





Description Saulo F. (father) appeals from the juvenile court’s jurisdictional findings and removal order concerning his children Hanna F. (born September 2015) and Rachelle F. (born October 2016). The children had previously been in the custody of H.B. (mother), thus father was a noncustodial parent at the time of the removal.
Rating
0/5 based on 0 votes.
Views 6 views. Averaging 0 views per day.

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2021 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2021 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale