legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Cooper

P. v. Cooper
08:07:2007



P. v. Cooper



Filed 7/30/07 P. v. Cooper CA3



NOT TO BE PUBLISHED



California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.



IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA



THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT



(Shasta)



----



THE PEOPLE,



Plaintiff and Respondent,



v.



HENRY COOPER,



Defendant and Appellant.



C054812



(Super. Ct. No. 06F10461)



Defendant Henry Cooper, along with a codefendant, received a stolen drivers license and social security card belonging to the victim, Cynthia A. Chaffer. Defendant entered a negotiated plea of no contest to one count of receiving stolen property (Pen. Code, 496, subd. (a); undesignated section references are to the Penal Code) and admitted one of two prior strikes ( 1170.12) in exchange for a stipulated prison sentence of six years, comprised of the three-year upper term for the charged offense, doubled pursuant to section 1170.12 for the strike.



Upon a waiver of referral to probation, the court sentenced defendant to the stipulated six-year term (minus 85 days of presentence custody credit) and imposed various fees and fines.



Defendant appeals. We appointed counsel to represent defendant on appeal. Counsel filed an opening brief that sets forth the facts of the case and requests this court to review the record and determine whether there are any arguable issues on appeal. (People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436.) Defendant was advised by counsel of the right to file a supplemental brief within 30 days of the date of filing of the opening brief. More than 30 days elapsed, and we received no communication from defendant.



Having undertaken an examination of the entire record, we find no arguable error that would result in a disposition more favorable to defendant.



DISPOSITION



The judgment is affirmed.



SIMS , Acting P.J.



We concur:



NICHOLSON , J.



BUTZ , J.



Publication courtesy of San Diego pro bono legal advice.



Analysis and review provided by Poway Property line attorney.





Description Defendant Henry Cooper, along with a codefendant, received a stolen drivers license and social security card belonging to the victim, Cynthia A. Chaffer. Defendant entered a negotiated plea of no contest to one count of receiving stolen property (Pen. Code, 496, subd. (a); undesignated section references are to the Penal Code) and admitted one of two prior strikes ( 1170.12) in exchange for a stipulated prison sentence of six years, comprised of the three year upper term for the charged offense, doubled pursuant to section 1170.12 for the strike.
Having undertaken an examination of the entire record, Court find no arguable error that would result in a disposition more favorable to defendant. The judgment is affirmed.

Rating
0/5 based on 0 votes.

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale