legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Classon

P. v. Classon
04:29:2008



P. v. Classon



Filed 4/28/08 P. v. Classon CA2/5



NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS



California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.



IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA



SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT



DIVISION FIVE



THE PEOPLE,



Plaintiff and Respondent,



v.



DANIEL CLASSON,



Defendant and Appellant.



B198804



(Los Angeles County



Super. Ct. No. SA057318)



APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Cynthia Rayvis, Judge. Dismissed.



Kathleen M. Redmond, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant.



Edmund G. Brown, Jr., Attorney General, Dane R. Gillette, Chief Assistant Attorney General, Pamela C. Hamanaka, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Steven D. Matthews and Paul M. Roadarmel Jr., Deputy Attorneys General, for Plaintiff and Respondent.



Defendant, Daniel Classon, appeals following his nolo contendere plea for failing to register as a sex offender. (Pen. Code, 290, subd. (b).) On February 25, 2008, a no bail bench warrant was issued for defendants arrest who was placed on probation. We issued an order to show cause as to whether defendants appeal should be dismissed because of his fugitive status. Because the uncontradicted evidence demonstrates defendant is currently a fugitive, his appeal should be dismissed. (People v. Redinger (1880) 55 Cal. 290, 299; People v. Kang (2003) 107 Cal.App.4th 43, 52; People v. Buffalo (1975) 49 Cal.App.3d 838, 839.) We need not address other issues concerning our authority to address the merits of defendants challenge to the validity of his nolo contendere plea. (In re Chavez (2003) 30 Cal.4th 643, 649; People v. Hoffard (1995) 10 Cal.4th 1170, 1177-1178.)



The appeal is dismissed.



NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS



TURNER, P. J.



We concur:



ARMSTRONG, J.



KRIEGLER, J.



Publication Courtesy of California lawyer directory.



Analysis and review provided by Escondido Property line Lawyers.



San Diego Case Information provided by www.fearnotlaw.com





Description Defendant, Daniel Classon, appeals following his nolo contendere plea for failing to register as a sex offender. (Pen. Code, 290, subd. (b).) On February 25, 2008, a no bail bench warrant was issued for defendants arrest who was placed on probation. We issued an order to show cause as to whether defendants appeal should be dismissed because of his fugitive status. Because the uncontradicted evidence demonstrates defendant is currently a fugitive, his appeal should be dismissed. (People v. Redinger (1880) 55 Cal. 290, 299; People v. Kang (2003) 107 Cal.App.4th 43, 52; People v. Buffalo (1975) 49 Cal.App.3d 838, 839.) Court need not address other issues concerning our authority to address the merits of defendants challenge to the validity of his nolo contendere plea. (In re Chavez (2003) 30 Cal.4th 643, 649; People v. Hoffard (1995) 10 Cal.4th 1170, 1177-1178.)
The appeal is dismissed.


Rating
0/5 based on 0 votes.

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale