P. v. Clark
Filed 9/3/09 P. v. Clark CA2/5
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION FIVE
THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. MICHAEL ANTHONY CLARK, Defendant and Appellant. | B214311 (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. LA059568) |
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Susan M. Speer, Judge. Affirmed.
Christine C. Shaver, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant.
No appearance for Plaintiff and Respondent.
______________________________________
Publication courtesy of California pro bono legal advice.
Analysis and review provided by La Mesa Property line attorney.
San Diego Case Information provided by www.fearnotlaw.com
Defendant and appellant Michael Anthony Clark pled guilty to a charge of failing to file a change of address in violation of Penal Code section 190.013, subdivision (b). Defendant admitted suffering four prior convictions under the three strikes law. (Pen. Code, 1170.12, subds. (a)-(d) and 667, subds. (b)-(i).) The trial court struck three of the four prior convictions and imposed a second strike sentence of eight years. Defendant filed a notice of appeal and obtained a certificate of probable cause from the trial court.
According to the preliminary hearing transcript, defendant was released on parole on June 3, 2008. Defendant was a convicted sex offender who was required to register with law enforcement pursuant to Penal Code section 290 by June 11, 2008. He had last registered on April 12, 2007. Defendant absconded from parole without registering as a sex offender. He was interviewed in custody on July 29, 2008, at which time he admitted he had failed to register as required.
This court appointed counsel to represent defendant on appeal. On July 14, 2009, counsel filed a brief pursuant to People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436, raising no issues but requesting this court to independently review the record for error. Defendant was notified by letter, dated July 15, 2009, of his right to file a supplemental brief raising any arguable issues on appeal within 30 days. No brief has been filed by defendant.
This court has completed its independent review of the record. There are no arguable issues on appeal. The judgment is affirmed. (Smith v. Robbins (2000) 528 U.S. 259.)
KRIEGLER, J.
We concur:
TURNER, P. J. ARMSTRONG, J.