P. v. Chappell
Filed 8/23/06 P. v. Chappell CA2/6
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 977(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 977(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 977.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION SIX
| THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. THERON CHAPPELL, Defendant and Appellant. | 2d Crim. No. B189992 (Super. Ct. No. F382713) (San Luis Obispo County)
|
Theron Chappell appeals from the judgment (order of commitment) entered following a court trial in which he was determined to be a mentally disordered offender. (MDO; Pen. Code, § 2962 et seq.) He was committed to the California Department of Mental Health for treatment as a condition of his parole. (Pen. Code, § 2966, subd. (b).)
We appointed counsel to represent him in this appeal. After examination of the record, counsel filed an opening brief in which no issues were raised.
On July 7, 2006, we advised appellant that he had 30 days within which to personally submit any contentions or issues which he wished us to consider. To date, we have not received a response from appellant.
We have examined the entire record and are satisfied that appellant's attorney has fully complied with his responsibilities and that no arguable issues exist. (People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436, 441.)
The judgment (order of commitment) is affirmed.
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED.
YEGAN, Acting P.J.
We concur:
COFFEE, J.
PERREN, J.
Roger Picquet, Judge
Superior Court County of San Luis Obispo
______________________________
Rudy Kraft, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant.
No appearance for Respondent.
Publication courtesy of California pro bono legal advice.
Analysis and review provided by La Mesa Property line attorney.
