legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Carrillo

P. v. Carrillo
02:08:2009



P. v. Carrillo



Filed 12/19/08 P. v. Carrillo CA2/5



NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS









California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.



IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA



SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT



DIVISION FIVE



THE PEOPLE,



Plaintiff and Respondent,



v.



EMILLIO CARRILLO,



Defendant and Appellant.



B208652



(Los Angeles County Super. Ct.



No. KA077721)



APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Bruce Marrs, Judge. Affirmed.



Gerald Peters, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant.



No appearance for Plaintiff and Respondent.



_______________________________



Defendant Emilio Carrillo entered a plea of guilty to a violation of Penal Code section 653w, subdivision (a), which prohibits the failure to disclose the origin of a recording or audiovisual work. Carrillo was placed on probation for a period of three years, with conditions requiring him to report to the probation officer, pay fines and fees, and complete 90 days of work at the tree farm.



Carrillo was found in violation of probation following a contested hearing and sentenced to state prison for the midterm of three years. He filed a timely appeal from the judgment.



Counsel was appointed to represent Carrillo on appeal. Counsel filed a brief pursuant to People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436 raising no issues but requesting this court to independently review the record. By letter, Carrillo was advised of his right to file a supplemental brief on his own behalf.



Carrillo has not filed a brief with this court. We have independently reviewed the record and find no arguable appellate issues. The judgment is affirmed. (Smith v. Robbins (2000) 528 U.S. 259.)



KRIEGLER, J.



We concur:



ARMSTRONG, Acting P. J.



MOSK, J.



Publication Courtesy of California free legal resources.



Analysis and review provided by Spring Valley Property line attorney.



San Diego Case Information provided by www.fearnotlaw.com





Description Defendant Emilio Carrillo entered a plea of guilty to a violation of Penal Code section 653w, subdivision (a), which prohibits the failure to disclose the origin of a recording or audiovisual work. Carrillo was placed on probation for a period of three years, with conditions requiring him to report to the probation officer, pay fines and fees, and complete 90 days of work at the tree farm. Carrillo has not filed a brief with this court. We have independently reviewed the record and find no arguable appellate issues. The judgment is affirmed. (Smith v. Robbins (2000) 528 U.S. 259.)


Rating
0/5 based on 0 votes.

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale