legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Camel

P. v. Camel
05:30:2008



P. v. Camel



Filed 5/27/08 P. v. Camel CA6



NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS



California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.



IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA



SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT



THE PEOPLE,



Plaintiff and Respondent,



v.



JOHNNY CAMEL,



Defendant and Appellant.



H031604



(Monterey County



Super. Ct. No. SS063147)



Defendant, Johnny Camel, appeals from a judgment entered after he pleaded no contest to possession of cocaine base for sale (Health & Saf. Code, 11351.5), and admitted one prior prison term and one strike prior. (Pen. Code, 667.5, subd. (b), 1170.12, subd. (c)(2).) On the date set for sentencing the defendant made a motion pursuant to People v. Marsden (1970) 2 Cal.3d 118. After the court heard and denied appellants motion, the court sentenced defendant to seven years pursuant to the terms of the plea agreement. This timely appeal ensued. We appointed counsel to represent defendant in this court.



Appointed counsel filed an opening brief which states the case and the facts but raises no specific issues. We notified defendant of his right to submit written argument in his own behalf within 30 days. That period has elapsed and we have received no written argument from defendant.



Pursuant to People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436, we have reviewed the entire record and have concluded that there is no arguable issue on appeal.



Disposition



The judgment is affirmed.



_____________________________________



rushing, P.J.



WE CONCUR:



_________________________________



PREMO, J.



_________________________________



ELIA, J.



Publication Courtesy of California attorney referral.



Analysis and review provided by Vista Property line attorney.



San Diego Case Information provided by www.fearnotlaw.com





Description Defendant, Johnny Camel, appeals from a judgment entered after he pleaded no contest to possession of cocaine base for sale (Health & Saf. Code, 11351.5), and admitted one prior prison term and one strike prior. (Pen. Code, 667.5, subd. (b), 1170.12, subd. (c)(2).) On the date set for sentencing the defendant made a motion pursuant to People v. Marsden (1970) 2 Cal.3d 118. After the court heard and denied appellants motion, the court sentenced defendant to seven years pursuant to the terms of the plea agreement. This timely appeal ensued. We appointed counsel to represent defendant in this court. Appointed counsel filed an opening brief which states the case and the facts but raises no specific issues. We notified defendant of his right to submit written argument in his own behalf within 30 days. That period has elapsed and Court have received no written argument from defendant. Pursuant to People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436, we have reviewed the entire record and have concluded that there is no arguable issue on appeal.

Rating
0/5 based on 0 votes.

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2026 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2026 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale