legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Brooks

P. v. Brooks
07:28:2008



P. v. Brooks



Filed 7/22/08 P. v. Brooks CA3



NOT TO BE PUBLISHED



California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.



IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA



THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT



(Yuba)



THE PEOPLE,



Plaintiff and Respondent,



v.



ANTHONY WALTER BROOKS,



Defendant and Appellant.



C057328



(Super. Ct. No. CRF06676)



In December 2006, defendant Anthony Walter Brooks pleaded guilty to failure to register under former Penal Code section 290, subdivision (g)(2). In January 2007, he was sentenced to the upper term of 36 months, execution of the sentence was suspended, and he was placed on probation.



In September 2007, defendant was charged with violating conditions of his probation by using methamphetamine and not participating in a court-ordered drug treatment program. In October, defendant admitted the charges, probation was revoked, and the previously suspended sentence was ordered into effect.



FACTS



Defendant was ordered to participate in a drug treatment program, but failed to do so. Defendant admitted to using methamphetamine from the end of July 2007 to the date of his arrest on an almost daily basis.



We appointed counsel to represent defendant on appeal. Counsel filed an opening brief that sets forth the facts of the case and requests this court to review the record and determine whether there are any arguable issues on appeal. (People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436.) Defendant was advised by counsel of the right to file a supplemental brief within 30 days of the date of filing of the opening brief. More than 30 days elapsed, and we received no communication from defendant. Having undertaken an examination of the entire record, we find no arguable error that would result in a disposition more favorable to defendant.



The judgment is affirmed.



BLEASE , Acting P. J.



We concur:



HULL, J.



BUTZ , J.



Publication Courtesy of San Diego County Legal Resource Directory.



Analysis and review provided by San Diego County Property line attorney.



San Diego Case Information provided by www.fearnotlaw.com





Description In December 2006, defendant Anthony Walter Brooks pleaded guilty to failure to register under former Penal Code section 290, subdivision (g)(2). In January 2007, he was sentenced to the upper term of 36 months, execution of the sentence was suspended, and he was placed on probation. In September 2007, defendant was charged with violating conditions of his probation by using methamphetamine and not participating in a court-ordered drug treatment program. In October, defendant admitted the charges, probation was revoked, and the previously suspended sentence was ordered into effect.



Rating
0/5 based on 0 votes.

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale