P. v. Awad
Filed 7/30/10 P. v. Awad CA1/1
California
Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or
relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except
as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This
opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for
purposes of rule 8.1115.
IN
THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FIRST
APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION
ONE
THE PEOPLE,
Plaintiff and Respondent,
v.
ABDUL HADI
AWAD,
Defendant and Appellant.
A128321
(Napa
County
Super. Ct.
No. CR120724)
Defendant
appeals from an order revoking his outpatient
status pursuant to Penal Code section 1608 (§ 1608). His counsel has filed an opening brief that
raises no issues and asks this court for an independent
review of the record to determine whether there are any arguable issues. (People
v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436 (Wende).) Defendant was notified of his right to file a
supplemental brief, but has not done
so. We affirm.
I.
In
January 2006, defendant was found not guilty by reason of insanity of assault
with a deadly weapon (§ 245, subd. (a)(1)) arising from an incident where
he attempted to commit suicide, and seriously injured a bystander, by driving
his car into a gas pump and other vehicles at a gas station. Defendant was committed to Napa State
Hospital (NSH) in February 2006, and was released on outpatient status in
January 2007. In August 2007, defendant
was arrested for driving under the influence, and the Napa County Conditional
Release Program (CONREP) requested that his outpatient status be revoked. The trial court granted the request, and we
affirmed the order in People v. Awad
(Jan. 14, 2008,
A119302)--another Wende case.
Defendant
was released on outpatient status in April 2008 under the supervision of Solano
County CONREP, and readmitted to NSH in June 2008 after eviction from a
residential treatment program for â€
| Description | Defendant appeals from an order revoking his outpatient status pursuant to Penal Code section 1608 (§ 1608). His counsel has filed an opening brief that raises no issues and asks this court for an independent review of the record to determine whether there are any arguable issues. (People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436 (Wende).) Defendant was notified of his right to file a supplemental brief, but has not done so. Court affirm. |
| Rating |
