P. v. Acron
Filed 12/18/09 P. v. Acron CA4/1
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.
COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION ONE
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. MICHAEL ACRON, Defendant and Appellant. | D055250 (Super. Ct. No. SCE281614) |
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Diego County, Charles W. Ervin, Judge. Affirmed.
Michael Acron entered negotiated guilty pleas to three counts of aggravated sexual assault of a child (Pen. Code, 269). Under the plea agreement, the prosecution agreed to dismiss four other counts of aggravated sexual assault of child, four counts of having committed a lewd act upon a child under the age of 14 and two counts of sodomy with a child under the age of 10, along with various allegations. The parties stipulated to a prison term of 45 years to life. The trial court sentenced Acron in accordance with the plea bargain stipulation.
Acron obtained a certificate of probable cause.
FACTS
During a one-year period in which he was the live-in boyfriend of the victims' mother, Acron had unlawful sexual intercourse with the woman's 13-year-old twin daughters and her 12-year-old daughter on numerous occasions. The molestations were discovered when one of the 13-year-old girls had vaginal bleeding and cramping, and was taken to a hospital. Tests showed the girl was pregnant. She subsequently miscarried.
DISCUSSION
Appointed appellate counsel has filed a brief summarizing the facts and proceedings below. Counsel presents no argument for reversal, but asks this court to review the record for error as mandated by People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436. Pursuant to Anders v. California (1967) 386 U.S. 738, counsel refers to as possible but not arguable issues: (1) whether Acron's guilty plea was constitutionally valid; and (2) whether there was a sufficient factual basis for the guilty plea.
We granted Acron permission to file a brief on his own behalf. He has not responded.
A review of the record pursuant to People v. Wende, supra, 25 Cal.3d 436, and Anders v. California, supra, 386 U.S. 738, including the possible issues referred to by appellate counsel, has disclosed no reasonably arguable appellate issues. Acron has been adequately represented by counsel on this appeal.
DISPOSITION
The judgment is affirmed.
McCONNELL, P. J.
WE CONCUR:
O'ROURKE, J.
IRION, J.
Publication Courtesy of California attorney directory.
Analysis and review provided by Oceanside Property line attorney.
