Outland v. Beverly
Filed 6/3/08 Outland v. Beverly CA2/7
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION SEVEN
CATHERINE OUTLAND, et al., Cross-Complainants and Respondents, v. WILLIAM BEVERLY, Cross-Defendant and Appellant. | B176880 (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. NC040406) ORDER MODIFYING OPINION AND DENYING PETITIONS FOR REHEARING (NO CHANGE IN JUDGMENT) |
THE COURT:
It is ordered that the opinion filed herein on May 15, 2008 be modified as follows:
1. On page 14, footnote 6, delete last sentence and add the following:
Unlike Bastonian, in this case, the stipulation by the trustee functioned to convey any rights necessary to proceed.
2. On page 19, delete the first sentence of the first full paragraph and replace it with the following:
Beverlys arguments all lack merit because until the Parcel Map was recorded, no subdivision of the property could lawfully occur.
The petitions for rehearing are denied.
There is no change in judgment.
_______________________________________________________________________
PERLUSS, P. J. ZELON, J. WOODS, J.
Publication Courtesy of San Diego County Legal Resource Directory.
Analysis and review provided by El Cajon Property line Lawyers.
