Fear Not Law CA Pub. Decisions

Mc MULLEN v. HAYCOCK

Filed 2/22/07 Mc MULLEN v. HAYCOCK
CA Pub. Decisions
_


Mc MULLEN v. HAYCOCK


Filed 2/13/07


CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION


IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA


SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT


DIVISION FOUR







HUGH S. McMULLEN,


            Plaintiff and Respondent,


            v.


DON H. HAYCOCK,


            Defendant and Appellant.



      B187748


      (Los Angeles County
      Super. Ct. No. SC078914)



            APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Los  Angeles County, Gerald Rosenberg, Judge.  Reversed and remanded.


            Don H. Haycock, in pro. per., for Defendant and Appellant.


            Timothy G. Dallinger for Plaintiff and Respondent.




            Under California law, assets held in private retirement plans are fully exempt from execution, both before and after distribution to the judgment debtor.  (Code Civ. Proc., §  704.115, subds. (b), (d).)[1]  Individual retirement accounts (IRA's), however, are exempt only to the extent â€

← Back to CA Pub. Decisions · Knowledge Base
Lean view · served in 1 ms · full site view