>

>Marriage of
Aminozzakeri and Shojaeddin



















Filed 10/12/10 Marriage of
Aminozzakeri and Shojaeddin CA4/3









NOT TO BE PUBLISHED
IN OFFICIAL REPORTS



California
Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or
relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except
as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This
opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for
purposes of rule 8.1115.





IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA



FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT



DIVISION THREE




>

In re Marriage of NAFICE AMINOZZAKERI and AMIR SHOJAEDDIN.
NAFICE AMINOZZAKERI, Respondent, v. AMIR SHOJAEDDIN, Appellant.	G042588 (Super. Ct. No. 05D003892) O P I N I O N

Appeal
from an order of the Superior Court
of Orange
County, Michael J. Naughton, Judge. Dismissed.

Amir
Shojaeddin, in pro. per., for Appellant.

Snell
& Wilmer, Richard A. Derevan and Todd E. Lundell for Respondent.

* * *



Husband
purports to appeal from the July 24,
2009 denial of his second
motion to set aside the judgment. That
motion, however, raised the same issue as his first motion to set aside the
judgment and offered the same evidence in support thereof. In his opening brief he complains that the
trial court erred in denying his first motion to set aside the judgment in
August 2008. Specifically he claims the
court erred when it refused to allow the introduction of relevant evidence,
found his investigator was not a qualified expert, and denied his request for
an evidentiary hearing. We deem his
second motion to set aside the judgment to be an invalid motion for reconsideration. A motion for reconsideration is not
appealable and an invalid motion for reconsideration does not extend the time
to appeal the denial of husband's 2008 motion to set aside the judgment. We therefore dismiss his appeal as untimely.[1] â€