legal news


Register | Forgot Password

Jonesfilm v. Hoffman

Jonesfilm v. Hoffman
05:14:2006

Jonesfilm v. Hoffman




Filed 5/4/06 Jonesfilm v. Hoffman CA2/8






NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS




California Rules of Court, rule 977(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 977(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 977.






IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA







SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT







DIVISION EIGHT














JONESFILM,


Respondent.


v.


PETER HOFFMAN,


Appellant,



B183198


(Los Angeles County


Super. Ct. No. BS 092529)



APPEAL from orders of the judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. Edward A. Ferns, Judge. Affirmed.


Peter Hoffman, in pro. per.; Gipson Hoffman & Pancione, Kenneth I. Sidle and Corey J. Spivey for Appellant.


Entertainment Law Group, Inc., and David T. Stowell for Respondent.


_________________________________


Peter Hoffman appeals from the court's order adding him as a judgment debtor as the alter ego to NTTS Productions Ltd. Jonesfilm cross-appeals from the denial of its motion for sanctions against Hoffman. We affirm both orders.[1]


FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY


Respondent Jonesfilm produced and owns the rights to the Kim Basinger and Mickey Rourke movie, â€





Description A decision regarding adding plaintiff as a judgment debtor as the alter ego to NTTS Productions Ltd.
Rating
0/5 based on 0 votes.

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale