Jewell v. Blonde, Inc.
Filed 5/23/08 Jewell v. Blonde, Inc. CA2/8
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION EIGHT
BRENDA JEWELL, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. BLONDE, INC., Defendant and Respondent. | B196173 (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. BC347880) ORDER MODIFYING OPINION AND DENYING REHEARING [NO CHANGE IN JUDGMENT] |
THE COURT*:
It is ordered that the opinion filed on April 23, 2008, be modified as follows:
(1) On page 6, the last sentence in the second paragraph is deleted. The following sentence is inserted in its place: Finally, the court refused to take judicial notice of an unpublished opinion as requested by Blonde.
(2) On page 12, the first sentence in the second paragraph is deleted. The following sentence is inserted in its place: We need not consider Jewells argument that the court improperly relied on an unpublished casedisparaging of counsel because the court stated in its order that it declined to take judicial notice of the unpublished opinion.
There is no change in judgment.
Appellants petition for rehearing is denied.
________________________________________________________________________
COOPER, P. J. RUBIN, J. FLIER, J.
Publication Courtesy of California attorney directory.
Analysis and review provided by Oceanside Property line Lawyers.
