In re P.A.
Filed 7/9/12 In re P.A. CA4/1
OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule
8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not
certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule
8.1115(b). This opinion has not been
certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115
COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION ONE
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
In re P.A., a
Person Coming Under the Juvenile Court Law.
SAN DIEGO COUNTY
HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES AGENCY,
Plaintiff and Respondent,
v.
P.A.,
Defendant and Appellant.
D061672
(Super. Ct. No.
J511465A)
APPEAL
from orders of the Superior Court of
County, David B. Oberholtzer, Judge. Dismissed.
P.A.
appeals orders denying his request for visitation with his daughter entered at
a postpermanency review hearing held pursuant to Welfare and Institutions Code
section 366.3. Citing
asks this court to exercise its discretion to review the record for error.
In
In re Sade C., the California
Supreme Court held that review pursuant to
is unavailable in "an indigent parent's appeal from a judgment or order,
obtained by the state, adversely affecting his custody of a child or his status
as the child's parent." (In re
Sade C., supra, 13 Cal.4th at p. 959.) We therefore deny P.A.'s requests to review
the record for error and to address the Anders issue. (Anders
v. California (1967) 386 U.S.
738.)
Citing
In re Phoenix H. (2009) 47 Cal.4th 835, P.A.'s counsel requests leave for
her client to file a supplemental brief in propria
persona. She also asks this court to
order counsel to brief any arguable issue.
(Penson v. Ohio (1988)
488 U.S. 75, 88.) The requests
are denied.
DISPOSITION
The
appeal is dismissed.
HALLER, J.
WE CONCUR:
BENKE,
PJ.
AARON,
J.
