In re Mia T.
Filed 1/8/13 In
re Mia T. CA4/1
>
>
>
>
>
>NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS
>
California Rules of Court, rule
8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not
certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule
8.1115(b). This opinion has not been
certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115>.
COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION ONE
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
In re MIA T.,
a Person Coming Under the Juvenile Court Law.
SAN DIEGO COUNTY
HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES AGENCY,
Plaintiff and Respondent,
v.
M.T.,
Defendant and Appellant.
D062752
(Super. Ct. No.
J516291E)
APPEAL
from orders of the Superior Court of href="http://www.adrservices.org/neutrals/frederick-mandabach.php">San Diego
County, Ronald F. Frazier, Judge. Dismissed.
M.T.
appeals orders entered at a jurisdiction and disposition hearing held pursuant
to Welfare and Institutions Code sections 300 and 361. Citing In
re Sade C. (1996) 13 Cal.4th 952, he asks this court to exercise its
discretion to review the record for error.
In
In re Sade C., the California
Supreme Court held that review pursuant to href="http://www.mcmillanlaw.com/">People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436
is unavailable in "an indigent parent's appeal from a judgment or order,
obtained by the state, adversely affecting his custody of a child or his status
as the child's parent." (In re
Sade C., supra, 13 Cal.4th at p. 959.) We therefore deny M.T.'s requests to review
the record for error and to address his Anders issues. (Anders
v. California (1967) 386 U.S.
738.)
M.T.'s
counsel requests leave for her client to file a href="http://www.fearnotlaw.com/">supplemental brief in propria persona (In
re Phoenix H. (2009) 47 Cal.4th 835), and asks this court to order counsel
to brief any arguable issue (Penson
v. Ohio (1988) 488 U.S. 75, 88).
The requests are denied.
DISPOSITION
The
appeal is dismissed.
MCDONALD, J.
WE CONCUR:
MCCONNELL,
P.J.
O'ROURKE,
J.