In re Maribel L.
Filed 7/14/06 In re Maribel L. CA5
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 977(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 977(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 977.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
| In re MARIBEL L., a Person Coming Under The Juvenile Court Law. |
|
| THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. MARIBEL L., Defendant and Appellant. |
F049517
(Super. Ct. No. JJD59913) |
THE COURT*
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Tulare County. Hugo Loza, Commissioner.
Catherine Campbell, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant.
Bill Lockyer, Attorney General, Robert R. Anderson, Chief Assistant Attorney General, Mary Jo Graves, Assistant Attorney General, Louis M. Vasquez, Supervising Deputy Attorney General, and Leslie W. Westmoreland, Deputy Attorney General, for Plaintiff and Respondent.
-ooOoo-
A juvenile wardship petition (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 602) alleged appellant, Maribel L., a minor, committed felony possession of a concealable firearm by a minor (Pen. Code, § 12101, subd. (a)) and misdemeanor possession of live ammunition by a minor (Pen. Code, § 12101, subd. (b)(1)). Thereafter, appellant filed, and the court denied, a motion to suppress evidence (Pen. Code, § 1538.5). Following the subsequent jurisdiction hearing, the court found both allegations true, and, following the subsequent disposition hearing, the court placed appellant on probation.
On appeal, appellant's sole contention is that the court erred in denying appellant's suppression motion. We will affirm.
FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
At approximately 12:15 p.m. on July 29, 2005, Tulare County Probation Officers Shannon Oliver and Dennis Bonwell went to the residence of probationer Ignacio G. to perform a â€
