By petition for writ of mandate, father Oscar V. challenges the juvenile court order terminating reunification services and setting a permanency planning hearing for his children. He claims reasonable reunification services were not provided to assist him in finding adequate housing. He also claims the court erroneously applied a preponderance of the evidence standard rather than the clear and convincing evidence standard in its determination that returning the children to his care would create a substantial risk of danger. We conclude the requested relief is not warranted.