In re Luis M.
Filed 5/30/06 In re Luis M. CA2/1
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 977(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 977(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 977.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION ONE
In re LUIS M., a Person Coming Under the Juvenile Court Law. | B185080 (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. JJ12853) |
THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. LUIS M., Defendant and Appellant. |
APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Charles R. Scarlett, Judge. Reversed.
Anne E. Fragasso, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant.
Bill Lockyer, Attorney General, Robert R. Anderson, Chief Assistant Attorney General, Pamela C. Hamanaka, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Susan D. Martynec and Alan D. Tate, Deputy Attorneys General, for Plaintiff and Respondent.
____________________
INTRODUCTION
Defendant Luis M. appeals from an order declaring him to be a ward of the court pursuant to Welfare and Institutions Code section 602 for having committed the crime of driving or taking a vehicle without the owner's consent (Veh. Code, § 10851, subd. (a)). He challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to support the order, as well two of the conditions under which he was placed on probation. We reverse.
FACTS
On the afternoon of March 21, 2005, Los Angeles Police Officer Rodney Williams saw defendant driving a Toyota Camry south on Figueroa Street. He ran a computer check and discovered the car had been reported stolen. He stopped the car. Defendant had no driver's license or vehicle registration, and he had a â€
