In re Luis B.
Filed 5/24/07 In re Luis B. CA1/4
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION FOUR
In re LUIS B., a Person Coming Under the Juvenile Court Law. | |
THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. LUIS B., Defendant and Appellant. | A112925 (San Mateo County Super. Ct. No. 74889) |
Luis B. appeals from an order declaring him a ward of the juvenile court and committing him to the Camp Glenwood Program. His counsel raises no issues and asks this court for an independent review of the record to determine whether there are any arguable issues. (People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436.) Defendant was apprised of his right to file a supplemental brief but did not do so.
On November 9, 2005, defendant waived his right to a jurisdictional hearing and admitted that he committed felony grand theft (Pen. Code, 487, subd. (c)). The court dismissed the assault by means of force likely to produce great bodily injury count of the petition with a Harvey[1] waiver. The charges stemmed from defendants involvement in a theft and an assault upon a male victim. At the jurisdictional hearing which was held in the juvenile court in San Francisco, the court determined that defendants legal residence was in San Mateo. Over defendants objection, the court transferred the matter to San Mateo County for disposition.
The dispositional hearing was held on January 20, 2006. The court committed defendant to the Camp Glenwood Program. Finding extraordinary circumstances, the court waived restitution. The court further ordered that defendant comply with gang conditions and that he was entitled to 25 days of custody credits.
Defendant was represented by counsel. There was no error in the disposition. This court has reviewed the entire record and there are no meritorious issues to be argued.
DISPOSITION
The order is affirmed.
________________________
RIVERA, J.
We concur:
___________________________
REARDON, Acting P. J.
___________________________
SEPULVEDA, J.
Publication courtesy of California free legal advice.
Analysis and review provided by Carlsbad Property line attorney.
