In re L.S.
Filed 9/28/10 In re L.S. CA5
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS
California
Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or
relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except
as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This
opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for
purposes of rule 8.1115.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF
FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
In re L.S., a Person Coming
Under the Juvenile Court Law.
KERN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN
SERVICES,
Plaintiff and Respondent,
v.
A.S.,
Defendant and Appellant.
F060450
(Super.
Ct. No. JD121407-00)
THE COURT*
APPEAL from
an order of the Superior Court
of Kern County.
Robert J. Anspach, Judge.
Sharon S.
Rollo, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant.
No
appearance for Plaintiff and Respondent.
-ooOoo-
A.S.
(father) appealed from a May 2010 order terminating parental rights (Welf. & Inst. Code,
§ 366.26) to his daughter L.S. (child)[1] After reviewing the entire record, father's
court-appointed appellate counsel informed this court she could find no
arguable issues to raise on father's behalf.
Counsel requested and this court granted leave for father to personally
file a letter setting forth a good cause showing that an arguable issue of
reversible error did exist. (
Father later submitted a letter in
which he stated simply that he â€
| Description | A.S. (father) appealed from a May 2010 order terminating parental rights (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 366.26) to his daughter L.S. (child)[1] After reviewing the entire record, father's court-appointed appellate counsel informed this court she could find no arguable issues to raise on father's behalf. Counsel requested and this court granted leave for father to personally file a letter setting forth a good cause showing that an arguable issue of reversible error did exist. (In re Phoenix H. (2009) 47 Cal.4th 835, 844.) Father later submitted a letter in which he stated simply that he †|
| Rating |
