In re K.G.





Filed 6/2/11 In re K.G. CA5



NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS


California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.



IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

In re K.G. et al., Persons Coming Under the Juvenile Court Law.
KINGS COUNTY HUMAN SERVICES AGENCY, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. COLTON L., Defendant and Appellant.	F059670 (Kings Super. Ct. No. 09JD0088) OPINION

APPEAL from orders of the Superior Court of Kings County. George L. Orndoff and Thomas DeSantos, Judges.
Mitchell Keiter, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant.
Colleen Carlson, County Counsel, and Bryan Walters, Deputy County Counsel, for Plaintiff and Respondent.
-ooOoo-
INTRODUCTION
Danielle K. (mother) and Robert G. (father) were married in August 2003 and divorced in 2006. They had one child together, K.G., one of the two minors subject to the dependency proceedings. After mother divorced father, she met appellant Colton L. (appellant) in 2007, and they had one child together, C.L., who is the other minor subject to the dependency proceeding. Father met and became engaged to Stephanie J., who has two young sons.
After their divorce, mother and father shared physical custody of K.G. In November 2009, mother transferred physical custody of K.G. over to father per their arrangement, and a member of father's family discovered a large mark on K.G.'s posterior. After K.G. was examined at Hanford Community Medical Center (hospital), Lemoore Police conducted an investigation, and the Kings County Human Services Agency (agency) conducted a Multi-Disciplinary Interview Center (MDIC) interview of K.G. K.G. ultimately informed her interviewers that appellant bit her posterior and touched her â€