legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re Jordan S.

In re Jordan S.
01:14:2010



In re Jordan S.







Filed 1/6/10 In re Jordan S. CA4/1



NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS





California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.



COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT



DIVISION ONE



STATE OF CALIFORNIA



In re Jordan S. et al., Persons Coming Under the Juvenile Court Law.



SAN DIEGO COUNTY HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES AGENCY,



Plaintiff and Respondent,



v.



Teri B.,



Defendant and Appellant.



D056036



(Super. Ct. No. NJ13579A-B)



APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of San Diego County, Michael Imhoff, Commissioner. Dismissed.



Teri B. appeals an order for supervised visitation entered at a dispositional hearing held pursuant to Welfare and Institutions Code section 361. Citing In re Sade C. (1996) 13 Cal.4th 952, she asks this court to exercise its discretion to review the record for error.



In In re Sade C., the California Supreme Court held that review pursuant to People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436 is unavailable in "an indigent parent's appeal from a judgment or order, obtained by the state, adversely affecting . . . her custody of a child or . . . her status as the child's parent." (In re Sade C., supra, 13 Cal.4th at p. 959.) We therefore deny appellant's requests to review the record for error and to address the Anders issue. (Anders v. California (1967) 386 U.S. 738.)



Appellant's counsel also requests leave for her client to file a supplemental brief in propria persona. The request is denied.



DISPOSITION



The appeal is dismissed.





HALLER, J.



WE CONCUR:





MCCONNELL, P.J.





MCINTYRE, J.



Publication courtesy of California pro bono legal advice.



Analysis and review provided by La Mesa Property line attorney.



San Diego Case Information provided by www.fearnotlaw.com





Description Teri B. appeals an order for supervised visitation entered at a dispositional hearing held pursuant to Welfare and Institutions Code section 361. Citing In re Sade C. (1996) 13 Cal.4th 952, she asks this court to exercise its discretion to review the record for error. In In re Sade C., the California Supreme Court held that review pursuant to People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436 is unavailable in "an indigent parent's appeal from a judgment or order, obtained by the state, adversely affecting . . . her custody of a child or . . . her status as the child's parent." (In re Sade C., supra, 13 Cal.4th at p. 959.) We therefore deny appellant's requests to review the record for error and to address the Anders issue. (Anders v. California (1967) 386 U.S. 738.) Appellant's counsel also requests leave for her client to file a supplemental brief in propria persona. The request is denied.

Rating
0/5 based on 0 votes.

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale