In re J.J.
Filed 2/27/09 In re J.J. CA1/3
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION THREE
In re J.J., a Person Coming Under the Juvenile Court Law. | |
THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. J.J., Defendant and Appellant. | A120266 (Alameda County Super. Ct. No. OJ06003810) |
In re J.J., On Habeas Corpus. | A122318 |
BY THE COURT:
It is ordered that the opinion filed herein on January 29, 2009, be modified as follows:
On the seventh line of the first full paragraph on page 9, the sentence beginning The offense involved four youths driving around the word deaf is deleted so that the sentence reads: The offense involved four youths driving around in a stolen car, looking for someone to rob, and attacking a 97-year-old woman and stealing her purse.
On the seventh line of the first full paragraph on page 12, in the sentence beginning On appeal, he does not dispute that he failed to object, delete the remainder of the sentence and replace it with: and although he urges this court to exercise its inherent authority to reach the merits on this issue, we decline to do so. The resulting new sentence will read: On appeal, he does not dispute that he failed to object, and although he urges this court to exercise its inherent authority to reach the merits on this issue, we decline to do so.
The petition for rehearing is denied.
There is no change in the judgment.
Dated: _______________ ____________________________ P.J.
William R. McGuiness
Publication courtesy of San Diego free legal advice.
Analysis and review provided by Santee Property line attorney.
