legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re Jayden A.

In re Jayden A.
01:18:2013





In re Jayden A








In re Jayden A.





















Filed 1/8/13 In
re Jayden A. CA4/1

>

>

>

>

>

>NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN
OFFICIAL REPORTS

>



California Rules of Court, rule
8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not
certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule
8.1115(b). This opinion has not been
certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115>.





COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT



DIVISION ONE



STATE OF CALIFORNIA






>










In re JAYDEN
A. et al., Persons Coming Under the Juvenile Court Law.







SAN DIEGO COUNTY
HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES AGENCY,



Plaintiff and Respondent,



v.



JESSICA K.,



Defendant and Appellant.




D062750





(Super. Ct. No.
NJ14660A-B)




APPEAL
from orders of the Superior Court of href="http://www.adrservices.org/neutrals/frederick-mandabach.php">San Diego
County, Cynthia Bashant, Judge. Dismissed.



Jessica
K. appeals orders entered at a jurisdiction
and disposition hearing
held pursuant to Welfare and Institutions Code
sections 300, subdivision (b), and 361.
Citing In re Sade C. (1996) 13
Cal.4th 952, she asks this court to exercise its discretion to review the
record for error.

In
In re Sade C., the California Supreme
Court held that review pursuant to People
v. Wende
(1979) 25 Cal.3d 436 is unavailable in "an indigent
parent's appeal from a judgment or order, obtained by the state, adversely
affecting [her] custody of a child or [her] status as the child's
parent." (In re Sade C., supra,
13 Cal.4th at p. 959.) We therefore deny
Jessica's requests to review the record for error and to address her >Anders issue. (>Anders v. California (1967) 386 U.S. 738.)

Jessica's
counsel requests leave for her client to file a href="http://www.fearnotlaw.com/">supplemental brief in propria persona (In
re Phoenix H.
(2009) 47 Cal.4th 835) and also asks this court to order
counsel to brief any arguable issue (Penson
v. Ohio
(1988) 488 U.S. 75, 88).
The requests are denied.

DISPOSITION

The
appeal is dismissed.





HALLER, J.



WE CONCUR:







BENKE,
Acting P.J.







NARES,
J.







Description Jessica K. appeals orders entered at a jurisdiction and disposition hearing held pursuant to Welfare and Institutions Code sections 300, subdivision (b), and 361. Citing In re Sade C. (1996) 13 Cal.4th 952, she asks this court to exercise its discretion to review the record for error.
In In re Sade C., the California Supreme Court held that review pursuant to People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436 is unavailable in "an indigent parent's appeal from a judgment or order, obtained by the state, adversely affecting [her] custody of a child or [her] status as the child's parent." (In re Sade C., supra, 13 Cal.4th at p. 959.) We therefore deny Jessica's requests to review the record for error and to address her Anders issue. (Anders v. California (1967) 386 U.S. 738.)
Jessica's counsel requests leave for her client to file a supplemental brief in propria persona (In re Phoenix H. (2009) 47 Cal.4th 835) and also asks this court to order counsel to brief any arguable issue (Penson v. Ohio (1988) 488 U.S. 75, 88). The requests are denied.
Rating
0/5 based on 0 votes.

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2026 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2026 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale