legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re Jake H.

In re Jake H.
02:16:2013






In re Jake H












In re Jake H.



















Filed 1/28/13 In re Jake H. CA4/1













>NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

>

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts
and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or
ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for
publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115>.





COURT
OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT



DIVISION
ONE



STATE
OF CALIFORNIA






>










In re JAKE H. et al., Persons
Coming Under the Juvenile Court Law.







SAN DIEGO
COUNTY HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES AGENCY,



Plaintiff and Respondent,



v.



JULIE H.,



Defendant and Appellant.




D062861





(Super. Ct.
No. NJ14692A-C)




APPEAL from
orders of the Superior Court
of href="http://www.adrservices.org/neutrals/frederick-mandabach.php">San Diego
County, Michael Imhoff, Commissioner. Dismissed.



Julie H.
appeals orders entered at a jurisdiction and disposition hearing held pursuant
to Welfare and Institutions Code sections 300, subdivision (b), and 361,
subdivision (c)(1). Citing >In re Sade C. (1996) 13 Cal.4th 952, she
asks this court to exercise its discretion to review the record for error.

In In re
Sade C.
, the California Supreme
Court held that review pursuant to People
v. Wende
(1979) 25 Cal.3d 436 is unavailable in "an indigent
parent's appeal from a judgment or order, obtained by the state, adversely
affecting [her] custody of a child or [her] status as the child's
parent." (In re Sade C., supra,
13 Cal.4th at p. 959.) We therefore deny
Julie's requests to review the record for error and to address her >Anders issue. (>Anders v. California (1967) 386 U.S. 738.)

Julie's
counsel requests leave for her client to file a href="http://www.fearnotlaw.com/">supplemental brief in propria persona (In
re Phoenix H.
(2009) 47 Cal.4th 835) and also asks this court to order
counsel to brief any arguable issue (Penson v. Ohio (1988) 488 U.S. 75, 88). The requests
are denied.

DISPOSITION

The appeal
is dismissed.





McCONNELL, P. J.



WE CONCUR:







O'ROURKE,
J.







IRION,
J.









Description Julie H. appeals orders entered at a jurisdiction and disposition hearing held pursuant to Welfare and Institutions Code sections 300, subdivision (b), and 361, subdivision (c)(1). Citing In re Sade C. (1996) 13 Cal.4th 952, she asks this court to exercise its discretion to review the record for error.
In In re Sade C., the California Supreme Court held that review pursuant to People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436 is unavailable in "an indigent parent's appeal from a judgment or order, obtained by the state, adversely affecting [her] custody of a child or [her] status as the child's parent." (In re Sade C., supra, 13 Cal.4th at p. 959.) We therefore deny Julie's requests to review the record for error and to address her Anders issue. (Anders v. California (1967) 386 U.S. 738.)
Julie's counsel requests leave for her client to file a supplemental brief in propria persona (In re Phoenix H. (2009) 47 Cal.4th 835) and also asks this court to order counsel to brief any arguable issue (Penson v. Ohio (1988) 488 U.S. 75, 88). The requests are denied.
Rating
0/5 based on 0 votes.

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale