In re D.L.
Filed 11/28/07 In re D.L. CA1/2
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION TWO
In re D.L., a Person Coming Under the Juvenile Court Law. | |
THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. D.L., Defendant and Appellant. | A117660 (Contra Costa County Super. Ct. No. J0601526) |
Appellant D.L., a minor, appeals from an order of commitment adjudging her a ward of the court with no termination date, and placing her on probation in a court approved residential group home. Her counsel raises no issues and asks this court for an independent review of the record as required by People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436.
BACKGROUND
Appellant was charged in Alameda County with two counts of unlawful taking of a vehicle in violation of Vehicle Code section 10851, and two counts of receiving stolen property in violation of Penal Code section 496. Pursuant to a negotiated agreement, appellant waived her rights and pled guilty to one count of unlawful taking of a vehicle. The remaining count was dismissed. The court found that the maximum period of confinement was three years, and the matter was transferred to Contra Costa County for disposition.
On November 21, 2006, a supplemental petition was filed charging appellant with one count of resisting an executive officer under Penal Code section 69, one count of threatening a public officer under Penal Code section 71, and one count of battery upon an officer under Penal Code sections 242 and 243, subdivision (b). Appellant had become verbally abusive and threatening towards officers when asked to leave the area of a late night party in Antioch, and upon being taken into custody had kicked and elbowed the officer restraining her.
On November 28, pursuant to a negotiated agreement, appellant pled no contest to one new count of resisting a police officer, in violation of Penal Code section 148, subdivision (a)(1), a misdemeanor. Appellant was placed on six months of non-ward formal probation. She was also required to wear an electronic monitor for 60 days and was released into her mothers custody. She was also ordered to pay a restitution fine of $125.
Appellant violated the terms of her home supervision by leaving home without permission, failing to report to mandatory drug testing, and cutting school. A warrant was issued for her arrest on December 26, 2006. She was arrested on January 24. On February 6, 2007, appellant was released with electronic monitoring until March 26, 2007.
On February 8, 2007, appellant was arrested in connection with a robbery which had occurred on November 1, 2006. Appellant and her sister had robbed a young woman of her purse and cell phone. Appellant was positively identified by the victim, the victims cell phone was found in appellants pocket at the time of her arrest, and the victims identification card was found in appellants home. Appellant was charged with one count of grand theft in violation of Penal Code section 487, subdivision (c), and she denied the allegations.
On March 5, 2007, appellant waived her rights and pled no contest to an amended count two alleging grand theft in violation of Penal Code section 487, subdivision (c). The remaining count was dismissed, and she was released into the custody of her mother, subject to electronic monitoring. On March 18, 2007, when appellant downloaded her electronic unit, the unit reported that it had been uncharged for a period of about four days. On March 20, appellant was detained in juvenile hall pending disposition.
On March 29, 2007, appellant was adjudged a ward of the court, with no termination date, and was detained in juvenile hall pending placement. She was credited 53 days served in juvenile hall. Her Welfare and Institutions 300 status was terminated and she was ordered to pay a restitution fine of $100.
On May 18, 2007, appellant was placed at EEs Residential Group Home.
On April 23, 2007, appellant filed a timely notice of appeal from the disposition order.
DISPOSITION
Our independent review of the record reveals no arguable issues. Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed.
_________________________
Lambden, J.
We concur:
_________________________
Kline, P.J.
_________________________
Haerle, J.
Publication courtesy of California free legal advice.
Analysis and review provided by Carlsbad Property line attorney.